Home
Magazine
revel8 vs. SoSafe: an honest comparison for DACH companies 2026
revel8 vs. SoSafe: an honest comparison for DACH companies 2026

revel8 vs. SoSafe: an honest comparison for DACH companies 2026

September 8, 2026
5 min read
Lana Kuzmina
Cyber Threat Analyst
lana

For DACH companies facing NIS2 and AI-driven attacks, choosing the right awareness vendor is critical. SoSafe excels at scalable, behavioral-science-led training content, while revel8 delivers continuous, OSINT-driven multi-channel simulations with strict German data residency.

Table of contents

Get started
with revel8

  • Under the German BSIG, essential entities face fines of up to 10 million EUR and executives carry direct oversight liability under Section 38, making continuous training a statutory baseline.
  • SoSafe's strength is scale: behavioral-science-led gamified lessons across 30+ languages, well suited to large multilingual compliance rollouts.
  • revel8 focuses on OSINT-driven multi-channel simulations spanning email, SMS, vishing, MS Teams, and deepfake video, delivered continuously in the flow of work.
  • For DACH deployments, default group-level anonymization (minimum group size of five) and sovereign German hosting on STACKIT shorten works council negotiations.

What does the 2026 DACH threat landscape demand under NIS2?

The cybersecurity landscape across Germany, Austria, and Switzerland has undergone a structural shift as threat actors use generative artificial intelligence to scale targeted, multi-channel campaigns. As traditional mass phishing gives way to context-rich social engineering, employees represent an organization's most critical active defense layer. The 2026 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report notes that 62% of breaches involve human interaction, underscoring that building resilient daily habits across the workforce is fundamental to mitigating modern risk. In parallel, statutory requirements under the European NIS-2 Directive and the German BSI Act (BSIG) require both essential and important entities to establish verifiable, continuous training programs.

Under the German BSIG, essential entities face administrative fines of up to 10 million EUR, while executive leadership carries direct oversight liability under Section 38 BSIG. This makes continuous, verifiable workforce training a mandatory operational baseline rather than an optional exercise.

  • Statutory requirement for mandatory security awareness training across all employees
  • Internal management liability for executive leadership under Section 38 BSIG
  • Administrative fines of up to 10 million EUR for essential entities

How does SoSafe approach security awareness at scale?

Founded in Cologne in 2018 by psychologist Dr. Niklas Hellemann, SoSafe is one of the largest awareness platforms based in Europe and raised 73 million USD in a Series B round led by Highland Europe. Its underlying methodology relies heavily on behavioral science principles, using gamified training modules to build foundational cybersecurity habits across broad employee populations.

The platform excels in large-scale enterprise deployments where organizations require standardized educational content across multiple regions. Supporting over 30 languages, it enables global compliance teams to distribute policy-aligned modules across decentralized workforces.

  • Gamified training content covering NIS2, DORA, and ISO 27001 requirements
  • Psychology-backed nudge techniques to encourage safer routine handling
  • Broad language catalog spanning more than 30 localized regions

How do OSINT-driven multi-channel simulations work?

Modern cybercriminals rarely limit their targeting to a single communication channel. Instead, they combine public reconnaissance with AI voice cloning and direct messaging. The OSINT risk profiling engine gathers open-source data to mirror the exact information-gathering techniques used by real-world threat actors, ensuring attack scenarios reflect each user's job role.

Rather than relying on passive video courses, the Awareness Playlist delivers continuous micro-training directly within the daily workflow. Simulations execute across email, SMS, voice calls (vishing), MS Teams, and deepfake video, exposing staff to complex, multi-stage social engineering attempts.

How do the two platforms compare feature by feature?

When evaluating security awareness platforms, security leaders must differentiate between static compliance instruction and adaptive threat testing. SoSafe's published product overview describes phishing, smishing, and vishing tracks managed side by side in one campaign builder, with micro-learning pages triggered by a click. The comparison below reflects that documentation; where a capability is not described in SoSafe's public material, the table says so rather than asserting its absence. revel8, by contrast, folds automated voice cloning and deepfake video scenarios into a single continuous risk assessment.

FeatureSoSaferevel8 Platform
Core training methodologyGamified lessons plus micro-learning pages after a clickOSINT-driven continuous simulations with adaptive playlists
Voice phishing (vishing)Vishing tracks in the campaign builderFully integrated automated AI vishing (any scenario possible)
Deepfake video simulationNot listed in the published product overviewNative multi-channel scenario engine including deepfake video
Language catalog30+ localized languages34+ localized languages
Cloud infrastructureEuropean cloud hostingSTACKIT sovereign German hosting

User reviews on independent software evaluation platforms highlight high satisfaction with SoSafe's gamified lessons for general employee onboarding, while noting that administrative support response times can fluctuate during complex enterprise rollouts.

What do works council rules and data residency require?

Deploying security testing platforms within German-speaking countries demands alignment with employee privacy regulations and the German Works Constitution Act (BetrVG). Because simulation results are performance-related employee data, CISOs need reporting that produces audit evidence for NIS2 without exposing individual behavior to management.

Data sovereignty forms another critical decision metric for DACH risk management. Hosting on the sovereign STACKIT cloud marketplace guarantees that data processing occurs exclusively on German infrastructure with zero transfers to third-country jurisdictions. Built-in privacy controls enforce default group-level anonymization with a minimum reporting threshold of five users, streamlining works council negotiations.

  • Sovereign German cloud hosting on STACKIT infrastructure with zero US data flows
  • Mandatory group-level reporting anonymization with a minimum threshold of five users
  • Pre-packaged works council agreement templates tailored for BetrVG alignment

Which platform fits which kind of organization?

Selecting the appropriate security platform depends on organizational priorities, infrastructure requirements, and threat exposure. SoSafe remains a strong choice for enterprise organizations seeking a broad multilingual catalog, an established European brand presence, and gamified learning paths with adaptive difficulty for global staff.

Conversely, organizations seeking to defend against AI-driven voice cloning, deepfake video lures, and OSINT-targeted social engineering benefit from multi-channel simulations. Combined with specialized modules in the Academy, security teams can replace passive compliance checkboxes with measurable human resilience.

  • Choose SoSafe when focusing on traditional e-learning modules to satisfy standard compliance checkboxes.
  • Choose revel8 when prioritizing AI vishing, deepfake simulations, and sovereign German STACKIT hosting, while also having access to the interactive Academy and comprehensive compliance reporting.

To see how OSINT-driven multi-channel simulations prepare your organization for generative AI threats, explore our interactive modules or book a live demonstration with our security analysts today.

FAQ

How do revel8 and SoSafe approach deepfake simulations?

revel8 integrates deepfake video and AI vishing directly into its continuous simulation engine, adapting scenarios using OSINT data. SoSafe's published product overview describes phishing and smishing tracks in a unified campaign builder, but does not list deepfake video simulation as a channel.

What is the maximum NIS2 fine for essential entities in Germany?

Under Section 65 BSIG implementing NIS2, essential entities face administrative fines of up to 10 million EUR. The alternative ceiling of 2 percent of worldwide annual turnover applies only where turnover exceeds 500 million EUR, so the flat 10 million EUR cap is the figure most Mittelstand entities should plan against.

Does SoSafe support multi-channel threat simulations?

Yes. SoSafe documents phishing, smishing, and vishing tracks managed side by side in one dashboard. revel8 extends the channel set further, running email, SMS, voice, and deepfake video scenarios that are personalized per user from OSINT data.

How does revel8 ensure compliance with the German Betriebsvereinbarung?

revel8 is designed for strict works council (BetrVG) compliance by enforcing default group-level reporting anonymization with a minimum group size of five. This protects employee privacy while still delivering actionable metrics for security teams.

Where is customer data hosted for each platform?

revel8 hosts all customer environments natively on STACKIT, the Schwarz Group's cloud infrastructure in Germany. SoSafe also operates on European hosting, though the specific server architecture varies by enterprise tier.

Is SoSafe or revel8 better for large, multilingual compliance rollouts?

SoSafe is a strong choice for very large global organizations that prioritize a broad lesson catalog and a traditional e-Learning offer. revel8 is built for DACH organizations prioritizing realistic, localized AI threat defense and continuous simulations.

Sources

Related Articles

White abstract curved shape with jagged edges on a black background.

Ready to defend against
AI-powered attacks?